Cuba 50 Year Celebration Tour
Climate Alarmists Vs Senate “Consensus Busters” Report
“climate alarmists might be wrong.” Is it true? Well of course there is a 50% chance that climate alarmists are wrong. So why is there such hatred towards the people who consider themselves skeptics of the disaster scenario Gore paints. They are called “The Deniers” like some fringe group associated with hate and bigotry.
Some want to paint skeptics as evil, not smart enough or paid off. They are too stupid to figure it out so we are going to let Al Gore lead us to the salvation of Earth. Al Gore? Maybe the messenger is and his message are too political to convince certain people that his theory is correct, And maybe his science is questionable too. Or all the money he makes with his “the end is coming” $6000 a minute speech.
The problem may be that his theory involves changing laws and raising taxes and making “you” change the way “you” live. So there is a 50% chance he is wrong and he wants 100% of your support. If not you get labeled “Denier!” What no debate? What a great position to have, I’m right conversations over..
Remember when Al wanted to recount the Florida 2000 vote over and over again until the Supreme Court said “Stop this Circus, Bush is President,” the same election where the Democrats in West Palm Beach voted by “mistake” for Pat Buchanan and gave G.W.B the victory?
Since then Al Gore and his followers have made every effort to make Gore more powerful than the President a “Saint” and “winner of all awards” except Time’s “person of the Year.” You can’t win them all Al. ..mpress
400 scientists who disagree with the Gore team .
In October, the Washington Post Staff Writer Juliet Eilperin conceded the obvious, writing that climate skeptics “appear to be expanding rather than shrinking.” Many scientists from around the world have dubbed 2007 as the year man-made global warming fears “bites the dust.” (LINK)
This blockbuster Senate report lists the scientists by name, country of residence, and academic/institutional affiliation. It also features their own words, biographies, and weblinks to their peer reviewed studies and original source materials as gathered from public statements, various news outlets, and websites in 2007. This new “consensus busters” report is poised to redefine the debate.
Source: epw.senate.gov
Filed under: Al Gore, Climate Change, News, Politics, Senate report, global warming
Specifically, the “consensus” about anthropogenic climate change entails the following:
1) the climate is undergoing a pronounced warming trend beyond the range of natural variability;
2) the major cause of most of the observed warming is rising levels of the greenhouse gas CO2;
3) the rise in CO2 is the result of burning fossil fuels;
4) if CO2 continues to rise over the next century, the warming will continue; and
5) a climate change of the projected magnitude over this time frame represents potential danger to human welfare and the environment.
These conclusions have been explicitly endorsed by …
Academia Brasiliera de Ciências (Bazil)
Royal Society of Canada
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Academié des Sciences (France)
Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina (Germany)
Indian National Science Academy
Accademia dei Lincei (Italy)
Science Council of Japan
Russian Academy of Sciences
Royal Society (United Kingdom)
National Academy of Sciences (United States of America)
Australian Academy of Sciences
Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for Sciences and the Arts
Caribbean Academy of Sciences
Indonesian Academy of Sciences
Royal Irish Academy
Academy of Sciences Malaysia
Academy Council of the Royal Society of New Zealand
Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
In addition to these national academies, the following institutions specializing in climate, atmosphere, ocean, and/or earth sciences have endorsed these conclusions:
NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
National Academy of Sciences (NAS)
State of the Canadian Cryosphere (SOCC)
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Royal Society of the United Kingdom (RS)
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
American Institute of Physics (AIP)
National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR)
American Meteorological Society (AMS)
Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society (CMOS)
I’ll take this “consensus” over the 400 “scientists” handpicked by Sen Inhofe for his minority skeptics report.
All of those institutions need money to operate. There are just as many on the other side who question the theory that climate change is man made. The arrogance of saying “consensus” is fact and skeptics are corrupt “Deniers” does not help the debate.